| Actual and Intended Use of Trademarks |
|
| Trademark rights are gained by actual use of a mark rather than by registration. Generally the first party who uses a mark in commerce has the right to use the mark in that geographic area as well as in the natural zone of expansion for that geographic area. Any shipment of goods bearing the trademark across a state line in the normal course of business satisfies the "use in commerce" requirement. Token sales made solely to establish trademark use do not constitute legally sufficient "use." More... |
|
|
| Copyright Statutory Formalities |
|
| Copyright protection in the United States is automatic upon the fixation of an original work of authorship. The use of the copyright notice and the registration of a work are referred to as formalities, which are the procedural requirements for securing and maintaining full copyright protection, and were formerly requirements for copyright protection. Some of the most sweeping changes under the 1976 Copyright Act involve copyright formalities. More... |
|
|
| Internet Domain Names |
|
| Copyright law does not protect domain names. Generally, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has tried to apply traditional trademark law to the examination of domain name service mark applications. A domain name qualifies as a mark when it is used in connection with the sale or advertising of goods or services. This includes all sites conducting e-commerce and also sites that provide web-related services. Unlike a trademark, which is restricted by country and class of goods, domain names can be global and not limited by goods or service. More... |
|
|
| The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 |
|
| The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (AHRA) is an amendment to the United
States Federal Copyright Act of 1976. It provides that parties who import or manufacture "digital audio recording devices and media" must make payments to the United States Copyright Office. These payments are meant to act as the royalties that those who have copyrighted music have presumably lost through the consumer use of digital audio recording devices. The royalty fees are invested in specific U.S. securities and then disbursed to copyright holders yearly through the U.S. Copyright Office
More... |
|
|
| Reexamination of Patents |
|
| After a patent is issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the discovery of prior art or publications not noticed prior to the patent's issue may raise questions as to the validity of the issued patent. In such a case, a patentee or a third party may file an application for reexamination of the patent in the USPTO. For a third party, reexamination provides a lower cost alternative to a conventional lawsuit for challenging the validity of a patent. If the third party is an unsuccessful infringement defendant, a reexamination that results in the invalidation of a patent may provide vindication of that defendant's rights despite the results of the court case. For the patentee, the reexamination process may reveal the need to narrow a patent's claims in order to be in a better position to fend off a challenge to the patent's validity. In addition, the USPTO may take it upon itself to reexamine a patent without it being requested by the patentee or a third party. More... |
|
|